<p06230936c22fd11a30f4@[17.202.35.52]>
Current votes: None.
At 20:30 +0200 27/03/07, Maik Merten wrote: > >Actually the current <audio> draft requires user agents to support PCM >in a .wav container (that's way stronger than what can be found in the ><video> section). I guess your points apply there, too? > Yes, technically I think we should stay clean and write an HTML specification, not a HTML+coding specification. But at least in this case, most people already implement raw audio in AVI and WAV containers.