<op.uif58vz164w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>
Current votes: None.
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:43:55 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > - Perhaps the argument order should be (handler, delay, repeating) > instead, to be more like setTimeout / setInterval > > - Perhaps the "repeating" or even the "delayInSeconds" arguments should > be optional, defaulting to false and 0 respectively, and possibly in > combination with the above suggestion. I think that would be nice. I was wondering why startTimer returns a Timer object. What is the use case for that?