<op.uffm63foidj3kv@hp-a0a83fcd39d2.belkin>
Current votes: None.
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:37:12 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> > I suppose we could allow /* ... */, but that seems oddly specific... >> >> The spec could allow any text and conformance checkers could compete on >> being useful. Or the spec can be oddly specific. :-) Note though that // >> and <!-- are also javascript comments. > > I suppose if we want to support this for text/html... Not sure I follow. > What syntaxes do we want to allow? Only zero or more /*...*/ and //...\n > strings with any amount of whitespace before and after? For javascript I'd say yes and add <!--...\n to that, but then again I'm not a conformance checker developer. :-)