<op.t5nnldrx64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>
Current votes: None.
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:02:19 +0100, Frank Ellermann = <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> Or maybe simply say BCP47. > > Better, that automatically gives you 4646bis when > it's ready, together with the RFC 4647 ranges, I'm > still confident that this will work for your HTML5 > purposes (=3D nothing extravagant wrt language tags). I think we are all on the same page, by the way. It's just that the = current text in HTML5 was probably written before RFC4646 and that = referring BCP47 wasn't common practice. >> See also: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jan/thread.html#m= sg267 > > I've submitted both lists to GMane for subscription, > the latter flagged for "member-only" write access. http://blog.whatwg.org/w3c-restarts-html-effort has a simple set of = instructions on how to join the HTML WG. >> You mean the lastModified attribute of the Document >> object? > > Yes, the beast in 2.1.2 with 11 points explaining the > syntax in prose. The IETF ABNF isn't too bad, I got > used to it, lots of RFCs use it, and it will be soon > a full Internet standard (STD). I'll leave this up to Ian. -- = Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>