<c9d75e710801252006v6a748dbfga8c1d2623f79d97d@mail.gmail.com>
Current votes: None.
------=_Part_2425_17379824.1201320414129 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In the present standard you are alowd to use the same accesskey in to different links... For example: <a href="bob.html" accesskey="b">Bob web page</a> <a href="bob.html" accesskey="b">Bob web page</a> But what would happend if this was to happend: <a href="bob.html" accesskey="b">Bob web page</a> <a href="alex.html" accesskey="b">Alex web page</a> Again this is allowed in the present web standard, but if you think about it its illogical, on what bases thus the browser decide wich one to access first or should it open the tow? ------=_Part_2425_17379824.1201320414129 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In the present standard you are alowd to use the same accesskey in to different links... For example:<br><br><a href="bob.html" accesskey="b">Bob web page</a><br><a href="bob.html" accesskey="b">Bob web page</a><br> <br>But what would happend if this was to happend:<br><br><a href="bob.html" accesskey="b">Bob web page</a><br> <a href="alex.html" accesskey="b">Alex web page</a><br><br>Again this is allowed in the present web standard, but if you think about it its illogical, on what bases thus the browser decide wich one to access first or should it open the tow?<br> ------=_Part_2425_17379824.1201320414129--