<4F1742E2.4090707@gmx.de>
Current votes: None.
On 2012-01-18 22:55, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Adam Barth<w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dimitri Glazkov<dglazkov@chromium.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Dimitri Glazkov<dglazkov@chromium.org> wrote: >>>> Ah, that's a good question. This also must be specified. It should >>>> depend on the parent of the<content> element. If the parent is shadow >>>> root or<table>, then it should make<tr> the child of<content>. >>>> Otherwise, it should use foster parenting as usual. >>> >>> Oops, not "foster parenting", but "ignore" as you mentioned. Still >>> getting through the details of the parsing spec. >> >> There's also some subtly w.r.t. the pending character tokens. >> >> More generally, I think we'd all be much more sane if the HTML parsing >> algorithm was specified in the HTML living standard rather than >> modified ad-hoc in a number of different documents. > > That makes sense, but how will we handle the fact that the elements in > the algorithm aren't part of the HTML specification? > ... The algorithm should be specified so that all future elements follow the same parsing rules, thus no further changes are required. Best regards, Julian