Re: [whatwg] Dealing with UI redress vulnerabilities inherent to the current web

<11e306600809261444p9846e07ie88f7d7667ebc62d@mail.gmail.com>

Current votes: None.

------=_Part_25205_25657236.1222465479405
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Elliotte Rusty Harold <
elharo@metalab.unc.edu> wrote:

> I do think we have an existence proof that security in this realm is
> possible. That's Java. Modulo some outright bugs in VMs (since repaired) the
> default Java applet security model has worked and worked well since 1.0 beta
> 1. (1.0 alpha 1 wasn't quite strict enough.) I have seen no security design
> flaws exposed in Java applets in over ten years. That's why I suspect
> duplicating Java's security policy in HTML is a safe way forward. I'm
> skeptical that anything less will suffice.
>

You also see that Java is almost never used in the public Web. Java doesn't
prove anything.

Rob